Before ever becoming even remotely acknowledged by his sitting for various artists of the 18th and 19th centuries, Guy Van was, above all, a student of poetry. As he plays a great part in Schwender's novel, I thought it would be apt to start posting some of the work hes most (if at all) known for.
Oh Livid Bones and Gathers
All, oh livid,
Though red subtends mine marrowed brow
Instead and tongue in vitiate form from rend
Forged, “eat ten their brethren”
By that marrow measure forked
And borne to say that marrow, he
Beneath, “Squalled clouds, the men may foam
bricks bound long by edges’ trine”
My bones!
Oh! Love stative,
And arbored quoins whom quoin returns
In season they did listless borrow
Stock, cause coarse their bods’.
In throws the beasts be borrowed too, and leaden
Them, beasts’ do scroll their halves
Them they, the hundred orbs that split our naught
From day!
Full Post...
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Part 1: The Salvaged Works of Guy Van Menard
Posted by
Matthew Arnone
at
3:06 AM
1 comments
Monday, August 13, 2007
The Feral Cyst

“’If in dictate, all, then no man will be to bow and scribe…” has said the good Herodotus and from therein does stream our wan’d janitors paring crust from Europe’s augured failure-sepulcher; that is to say, we should take caution to creep not with heavy steps aside our history. Even the standing century has borne witness, in part, to the sight of its own stories already fraught to a crook by enmities masked in paradisaical bombast; and once usurped, they tales become twisted toward a braid upon themselves and yet will remain immune to all obloquy from their own tale-tellers (being not always wise to the minutiae of distortion).
Doubtless it is precisely the rough communal hands and scriptless vigor of the Gothic that in their modern absence contribute to the style’s now varicose adulation among the zealous and the mad who, to our present day, still churn foam in their lips’ fold at its mention and betwixt their crests spill garrulous sermon singularly necessitating the Gothic style for the slightest moral debris of a given man; he, now only a vessel punctured to limpidity, with each hole bored by some unique malice of the classical style to such degeneration so as no nectar however graced may keep him filled! Pugin is just one of these sorts of acolytes and his fanatic plans of a ‘Gothicised’ London to bright a new piousness within the West amounts to little surprise, though when proposed into corporeality, its strategy flags toward putrescence. Pugin’s pastoral limbo, woven in the sweated, dreamless sleep that he, each night, devotes to the see Fathers in distant Rome, is rather (to combine our examples) as if the grim ‘Lady of Paris’ were somehow in each detail duplicated and subsequently, with enormous tackles, upended and hoist upon its sister -- a monster seeming for all the world to have sprung inverted from its seeded sibling, from her horned crowns; a tumor’d twin, these Siamese, scalped in a grandly flat second and identical basement chattering skinless shed and weirdly high above the grey streets of Paris; the feral cyst, this noma somehow leapt from the nether of blindness to coax a moral gene… we weep the centuries out our eyes for any man bent to God from cancer.”
Within Schwender’s manuscript, the preceding paragraphs were accompanied by an inset etching (assumed to have been his) labeled “The Feral Cyst or Pugin’s Proposal Illustrated in its Effect” The impassioned paragraphs here quoted were originally written in condemnation of A.W.N. Pugin’s stated theories concerning a country-wide Gothic revisitism. Schwender’s source for the “outrageous” supposition was taken from Pugin’s publication the year prior in which he outlines the desirable influences a “…newly and wholly Gothic London” would have on its inhabitants not to be limited to excessive health, piety, crime reduction and “… grace beyond any sense in the brow of our Lord God”.
Of interest to me however, is Schwender’s bizarrely trance-like etching of Notre-Dame (Schwender’s etching is not in fact based on the visage of Notre Dame of Paris but instead borrows certain elements of its ornamentation combined with those of possibly Mantes Cathedral or another of Notre Dame’s sister chapels of varying similarity; the reason for this discrepancy or confusion with the example he explicitly gives within the text – either by mistake or puzzling intention – is unknown).
Full Post...
Posted by
Matthew Arnone
at
4:11 PM
1 comments
